Author: Res Publica

Reagent's Bachelor of Arts, emphasis in Literature
31 years old
Ohio Native

Categories
Our Stories

The Limits of Executive Power: A Cautionary Perspective on Amending Birthright Citizenship

On January 20, 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14160, titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” which seeks to redefine the scope of birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment (The White House, 2025). This order asserts that individuals born in the United States to mothers who were either unlawfully present or present on temporary visas, and whose fathers were not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents at the time of birth, are not entitled to automatic citizenship (The White House, 2025). While the intent to address perceived issues in immigration policy is clear, and many supporters of President Trump, including myself, value his commitment to prioritizing American interests, this executive action raises significant constitutional concerns. The Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of birthright citizenship is a cornerstone of American law, and altering its interpretation through executive order risks overstepping the bounds of presidential authority. This article serves as a cautionary reflection, urging that such a profound change should be addressed through the deliberate and democratic processes of Congress, not by unilateral executive action.

The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside” (U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1). This clause, often referred to as the Citizenship Clause, was designed to overturn the infamous Dred Scott v. Sandford decision of 1857, which denied citizenship to persons of African descent (The White House, 2025). The clause’s language is broad and unambiguous, establishing birthright citizenship—known as jus soli, or “right of soil”—as a fundamental principle of American identity. The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) further clarified that children born in the United States to non-citizen parents are entitled to citizenship, regardless of their parents’ status, so long as they are subject to U.S. jurisdiction (169 U.S. 649, 649–51). This precedent has stood for over a century, shaping the nation’s understanding of who is a citizen.

Executive Order 14160 argues that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” excludes certain categories of individuals born in the United States, specifically those whose mothers were unlawfully present or on temporary visas and whose fathers were not citizens or lawful permanent residents (The White House, 2025). This interpretation, however, diverges from established legal precedent. The Wong Kim Ark decision explicitly rejected the notion that parentage determines a child’s citizenship status, affirming that “the fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the territory” applies broadly (169 U.S. 649, 649–51). The executive order’s attempt to narrow this definition through administrative action has already faced legal challenges, with multiple federal courts issuing preliminary injunctions to block its implementation, citing its conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment (New York City Bar Association, 2025). These judicial interventions underscore a critical point: the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and its provisions cannot be altered by executive fiat.

As a supporter of President Trump, I admire his bold approach to addressing complex issues like immigration and national identity. His administration’s focus on securing American sovereignty and prioritizing citizens’ interests resonates with many who believe the nation’s laws must be enforced with rigor. However, the method of achieving these goals matters profoundly. The separation of powers, a bedrock of our constitutional republic, assigns distinct roles to the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Amending the Constitution or reinterpreting its core provisions is a power reserved for Congress through the amendment process outlined in Article V, which requires a two-thirds majority in both houses and ratification by three-fourths of the states (U.S. Const. art. V). Alternatively, significant changes to citizenship policy could be addressed through legislation, as Congress has the authority to define immigration and naturalization laws under Article I, Section 8 (U.S. Const. art. I, § 8). Executive Order 14160, by contrast, bypasses these democratic mechanisms, risking accusations of overreach and undermining the very rule of law that President Trump’s supporters champion.

The implications of this approach are not merely legal but also practical. Birthright citizenship has been a defining feature of American exceptionalism, distinguishing the United States from nations with more restrictive citizenship policies. Altering it through executive action could lead to a patchwork of enforcement, legal challenges, and uncertainty for millions of individuals born on U.S. soil. Reports have already emerged of unintended consequences, such as Native Americans being detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement due to confusion over documentation (New York City Bar Association, 2025). Such outcomes could erode public trust in the administration’s broader agenda, even among its supporters, and fuel perceptions of unfairness.

This is not to say that the issue of birthright citizenship is beyond debate. Reasonable arguments exist that the Fourteenth Amendment’s application to modern immigration challenges warrants reexamination. For example, some contend that the clause was not intended to grant citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants or temporary visitors, a perspective echoed in the executive order’s rationale (The White House, 2025). These arguments deserve a hearing, but they belong in the halls of Congress, where elected representatives can deliberate, debate, and craft legislation that reflects the will of the American people. A congressional approach would allow for a transparent and inclusive process, ensuring that any change to citizenship policy is thoroughly vetted and constitutionally sound.

President Trump’s leadership has galvanized millions by emphasizing accountability, sovereignty, and the protection of American values. To sustain this momentum, his administration must navigate the delicate balance between bold action and constitutional fidelity. Executive Order 14160, while well-intentioned, risks overstepping the executive’s authority and inviting judicial rebuke, as evidenced by the nationwide injunctions already in place (NAFSA, 2025). Instead of pursuing unilateral action, I urge the administration to work with Congress to address concerns about birthright citizenship through legislation or, if necessary, a constitutional amendment. This approach would respect the separation of powers, uphold the rule of law, and ensure that any changes reflect the democratic will of the nation.

In conclusion, while I share President Trump’s commitment to strengthening America, the Constitution must remain sacrosanct. Executive Order 14160’s attempt to redefine birthright citizenship by executive decree is a step too far, as it encroaches on powers reserved for Congress and the states. The Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of citizenship is not a mere policy preference but a constitutional mandate, one that has defined the nation for over 150 years. If reform is needed, let it come through the democratic process, not by rewriting the Constitution with the stroke of a pen. The writing on the wall is clear: true reform requires patience, deliberation, and fidelity to the principles that make America great.

References

  • NAFSA. (2025, May 14). Executive Order 14160 of January 20, 2025, Protecting The Meaning And Value Of American Citizenship. Retrieved from https://www.nafsa.org
  • New York City Bar Association. (2025, March 6). The Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship is Unconstitutional. Retrieved from https://www.nycbar.org
  • The White House. (2025, January 20). Protecting The Meaning And Value Of American Citizenship. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/protecting-the-meaning-and-value-of-american-citizenship/
  • United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).
  • U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV, Section 1.
  • U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8.
  • U.S. Constitution, Article V.
Categories
Our Stories

Trump’s Hardline Trade Tactics Deliver Global Concessions

In a series of diplomatic victories for the Trump administration, multiple nations have recently made major concessions in response to U.S. economic pressure. From Latin America to North America and beyond, President Trump’s tough stance on trade and immigration is reshaping global alliances and reinforcing U.S. economic leverage.

Colombia Bows to U.S. Deportation Demands

After President Trump threatened economic sanctions against Colombia for refusing to accept deported citizens, the South American nation quickly reversed its position. Colombian President Gustavo Petro authorized the return of deported nationals, even deploying the Colombian Air Force to assist with transportation. This decision follows Trump’s warning of steep tariffs on Colombian imports, a move that many believe forced Bogotá’s hand.

Panama Backs Away from China’s Belt and Road Initiative

In another major shift, Panama has announced its decision to withdraw from China’s expansive Belt and Road Initiative, signaling a diplomatic win for Washington. The U.S. has long viewed China’s infrastructure investments in Latin America as a strategic concern, and Trump’s efforts to curb Beijing’s influence appear to be paying off. The move was praised by U.S. lawmakers, including Senator Marco Rubio, who called it “a step in the right direction for protecting sovereignty in the region.”

Mexico Strengthens Border Security Under U.S. Pressure

Mexico, too, has adjusted its policies in response to Trump’s demands, agreeing to deploy 10,000 troops to its northern border to curb illegal immigration. The decision follows the administration’s announcement of new tariffs on Mexican goods, which were briefly delayed to allow for negotiations. Mexican officials have stated their commitment to securing the border, an issue that remains a key concern for the Trump administration.

Will Canada and the EU Follow?

With these major shifts in Latin America, speculation is mounting over whether other U.S. trade partners will follow suit. Canada and the European Union have faced similar pressure from the Trump administration, and some analysts predict they, too, will soon make concessions to maintain favorable trade relations with the United States.

Markets React but Quickly Stabilize

In the wake of these major policy shifts, financial markets initially reacted with panic, with stocks experiencing sharp declines and volatility surging. However, within hours, the markets stabilized as investors regained confidence, recognizing the long-term benefits of a stronger negotiating position for the U.S. This quick recovery suggests that despite initial uncertainty, Wall Street and global investors are adapting to Trump’s aggressive trade strategy.

As President Trump continues to use economic leverage to secure policy wins, the world is watching to see which nation will be next to adjust its stance in response to U.S. demands.

Categories
Our Stories

On a Roll!

President Trump’s Action-Packed Agenda: Executive Orders, Border Security, Energy Independence, and American Values

Washington, D.C. – Since assuming office, President Donald J. Trump has embarked on an ambitious path to restore what he describes as “American greatness,” signing a slate of executive orders and traveling to key states impacted by economic, natural, and social challenges. These actions reflect a commitment to advancing a robust policy agenda spanning national security, energy independence, economic reform, and cultural restoration.

A Surge of Executive Orders to Redefine Governance

President Trump has signed an unprecedented number of executive orders aimed at reversing policies of the prior administration while implementing his vision for a revitalized America. These orders cover a wide array of areas, from bolstering border security to cutting regulatory red tape and restoring accountability in government.

Among the most notable is a comprehensive directive to streamline federal bureaucracy, freeze non-essential hiring, and eliminate burdensome diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. This move, aimed at maximizing government efficiency, is part of his broader effort to “drain the swamp.” The President has also prioritized executive orders addressing energy independence, national security, and the protection of American values.

Commitment to Border Security and Public Safety

President Trump has taken bold steps to address the record-high border crossings and related criminal activity. Executive orders include reinstating the “Remain in Mexico” policy, ending catch-and-release practices, and empowering law enforcement and the National Guard to secure the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the President plans to designate transnational criminal cartels, including Tren de Aragua, as foreign terrorist organizations, leveraging the Alien Enemies Act to enhance deportation efforts.

During recent visits to North Carolina and California—states significantly impacted by immigration challenges and criminal activity—President Trump reaffirmed his commitment to prioritizing the safety and well-being of American communities. These trips underscored the administration’s focus on hearing directly from local leaders and citizens grappling with these pressing issues.

Energy Independence and Economic Relief

President Trump has declared a national energy emergency and initiated actions to reduce regulatory barriers for American energy production. By rolling back climate policies introduced by the Biden administration, the President aims to lower energy costs and restore U.S. energy dominance. This includes reducing restrictions on domestic oil production, mining, and critical infrastructure projects.

In his executive orders, President Trump has also emphasized the importance of consumer choice. From lightbulbs to dishwashers, his policies aim to end government overreach in everyday American life, offering consumers freedom and affordability.

The administration’s energy policy includes withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord and halting leasing to wind farms, which the President claims degrade natural landscapes and fail to meet energy demands effectively.

Cultural Restoration and Protecting American Values

President Trump’s agenda extends to reinforcing traditional American values. He has announced initiatives to preserve historical landmarks, protect women’s rights from what he terms “radical gender ideology,” and promote biological realities in public policy. These measures are part of his broader vision to foster a sense of national pride and unity.

Looking Ahead

The President’s sweeping reforms and actions signal a transformative era in American governance. While critics argue that these policies represent a sharp shift from the previous administration, supporters laud them as necessary steps to restore national security, economic stability, and cultural integrity.

As President Trump continues to visit states affected by crises and implement new policies through executive orders, his administration aims to solidify its legacy as one of decisive action and unyielding commitment to the American people.

The White House. (2025, January). President Trump’s America First priorities. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/01/president-trumps-america-first-priorities/

Categories
Our Stories

Thoughts on the Trip to D.C.

This January, Reid and I had the distinct honor of traveling to Washington, D.C., to attend the inauguration of President Donald J. Trump. While we were not in the front row, we were fortunate to find ourselves right in the midst of the action, surrounded by thousands of passionate individuals, all gathered to witness a defining moment in American history.

From the moment we arrived, the energy in the air was palpable. The streets of D.C. were lined with people from across the country, each contributing to the sense of occasion and excitement. As we made our way to the National Mall, the magnitude of the event began to truly sink in—this was more than just a political transition; it was a historic gathering, where citizens from all walks of life came together to be part of something larger than themselves.

Throughout the day, Reid and I made it our mission to capture as much of the event as possible. The crowd’s enthusiasm, the grandeur of the ceremony, and the historic speeches all offered a wealth of content that we were eager to share. From candid shots of the diverse crowd to the impressive procession, we documented the event from a variety of perspectives, hoping to convey the significance of the day not just through images, but through the emotions and spirit of the occasion.

The inauguration itself was a spectacular sight. The excitement in the air was contagious, with moments of anticipation and cheers that reverberated across the Mall. We had the opportunity to witness firsthand the power of democracy in action, as millions gathered to support the peaceful transfer of power, something that remains a cornerstone of American ideals. The atmosphere was charged with history, and every step we took through the crowds felt like we were walking through a living narrative.

As we return home and begin to review the content we captured, we are filled with a sense of gratitude and pride. The images and videos we took serve as a visual representation of the energy and optimism that permeated the event. We are excited to share this unique experience with our audience and encourage them to interact with the content, contributing their own perspectives and memories of that unforgettable day.

Our trip to D.C. was more than just an opportunity to witness a political event—it was a chance to be a part of something truly historic. The privilege of standing shoulder to shoulder with so many others, all there to witness a moment that will be remembered for years to come, is something that Reid and I will carry with us for a lifetime.

Categories
Our Stories

Tucker Carlson’s Interview with Putin; a Short Analysis

In the first few days following Tucker Carlson’s interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the internet was buzzing with chatter, but as is the norm, that chatter has begun to die down. One may be left wondering what good came of that interview; what purpose did it serve; what effects may it have had? The following discourse will explore these questions. 

According to Carlson, his desire to interview the Russian politician dates back some time and was stymied by the US Intelligence agencies and their various partners within the DOJ and the State Department amongst others – which very well could be the subject of its own lengthy article. While no concrete evidence of this is overtly available to link here, it seems logical that there is Truth to Carlson’s statements given the similar treatment by these intelligence Agencies of other prominent people of that day, such as:  George Papadopoulus, Roger Stone, Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, and a whole host of others.

Could Carlson’s desire to interview Putin come from a desire to elevate his own career? Perhaps Carlson sees something in Putin that he respects and admires. Maybe Carlson just wanted to spend time getting to know a man he sees as a kindred spirit of sorts. It has certainly been easy for many analysts of the left-leaning media outlets to cast such aspersions on Tucker, attributing his true desire for the interview as pure vanity.

Despite these subjective hypotheses, Carlson himself detailed in a follow up talk at the World Governments Summit just how timely in nature the interview was, and how it is his sincere hope that relations between Nations may be strengthened by having such a thought-provoking interview. The discussion he and the moderator had delved down deep, much deeper than any of the discussions happening in the American media following the Putin interview.

Towards the end of the discussion Carlson details the profound changes happening in our world today and how the true struggle of mankind is a Spiritual one. It is on this point that Carlson hits an axiom that the modern world is often willfully ignorant of. In Russia, however, religion is still strong and most Russian citizens have profound attachments to what we consider to be Judeo-Christian values.

In this regard Many of the western nations should have more in common than we observe in the world today. As mass-migration orchestrated by bad actors has severely impacted the homogeneity of many nation states, the delicate balance between social order and thirsty aspiration has grown ever more tenuous. 

It seems in many ways that the world is at a great crossroads in the present. Long-established moral, ethical, and liberal principles as well as long-held alliances between nations, states, and municipalities hang in the balance. In some places we have seen hopeful indicators that a realignment towards righteousness is coming. The new President of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele has made huge strides in turning his country from the most dangerous nation, to one of the safest on the globe. We have seen similar movements in other places, such as Argentina who just successfully put Javier Milei into power.

Only time will tell which way the future will go, but we must have Faith that the true universal power is guiding us. The time to choose order over strife is now; peace and prosperity over chaos and adversity. Carlson seems to share the sentiment that now is a time to sit at the table with Great Men in power, to find consensus, to put old grievances to bed, and to move boldly and bravely into a bright future.

Categories
Opinions

9/11 and January 6th; an Analysis

Three years after the incident at the Capital January 6th 2021, tempers still flare up on all sides. Some people feel that the incident that day has been grossly over exaggerated, over politicized, and over prosecuted while others feel the opposite: that too little has been done, that the process has taken too long, and that the individuals involved should receive no quarter.

Truth be told, this author sides with the camp that views the reactions to January 6th as a blatant sham – a kangaroo court in a banana republic seeking to deal “Justice” that fails to match the crime in question. Appallingly, some talking heads in the mainstream media have compared the events of January 6th to the terror attack on the World Trade Center September 11, 2001.

Such a comparison seems beyond the pale. The number of victims on January 6th is in single digits (five, according to the New York Times) whereas nearly 3,000 victims perished on 9/11. With this in mind, it is hard to fathom why a comparison would ever be made between the two events. Should the desire be to call the folks involved with January 6th “terrorists,” it is logical that you could do so without the comparison to the worst attack on American Soil since the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The incongruent numbers don’t only exist between the number of victims, but also between the number of individuals charged with crimes related to the two events. 23 years after 9/11, approximately 992 individuals have been charged in relation to the terror attack that cost 3,000 people their lives. However, only three years after January 6th, nearly 1,300 people have faced criminal charges with a possibility of many more yet to be charged.

It should be noted that January 6th, 2021 was a dark day in American history and that we at ContemporyConservative.net do not condone the actions taken by the mob who stormed the capital and delayed the certification of the election results by a period of hours. However, it seems clear as crystal that a comparison to the shocking events of 9/11 is perverse and inappropriate.

As time marches on, it will be interesting to continue to evaluate the media coverage and public sentiment surrounding January 6th. Hopefully such comparisons as those being made to 9/11 will cease (as they were never appropriate in the first place). 9/11 should remain to be what it was – the darkest day America has faced in this millennia.

Categories
Opinions

Ignore Her!

In an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper, congresswoman ‘AOC’ is calling on the Biden administration to simply “ignore” the ruling from a Texas federal judge that would halt the FDA’s approval of an abortion-inducing pill. She seems to show no shame or irony as she calls for the flouting of federal law, but considering Democrat’s history of such attitudes and behaviors, one shouldn’t really be surprised.

Though I’m sure there are countless examples, I can readily think of only a few that parallel the sentiment she is expressing on the National broadcast with Anderson. After the 2008 housing market crash there were calls from Democrats to “Stay in your Homes” despite bank foreclosures and legal eviction proceedings. The “occupy Wall-street” movement of those days seemed to have a very strong foothold among the liberals of that day, just as more recent movements such as “Black Lives Matter” were met with many of the same attitudes from the same crowd.

Liberals asked us to imagine fiery and violent protests as a “summer of love,” and of course they excused the actions of the protestors in the aftermath of the George Floyd overdose. George Soros funded District Attorneys chose not to prosecute the perpetrators of the countless property damage crimes that were committed, however the people who entered the capital building on January 1st were quickly judged as guilty and some are still rotting in jail to this day without having the right to a trial. 

Many of the crimes committed by the current administration, such as the botched withdrawal from Afghanistan that killed 13 service members are being ignored. And meanwhile the liberals on capital hill, such as AOC, ask us to ignore federal law so that abortions can continue to be available to any “birthing person” seeking the medicine… well in my humble opinion it is time to ignore her, and her ilk. There is only one path forward and it is to keep on trucking – not to look aside, ignore the truth, or get down into the weeds with someone as low-IQ as her.

Categories
Our Stories

Trump Desantis Head to Head

With Trump’s name in the news more and more due to the recent legal developments out of New York, it is becoming clearer and clearer that he and Florida Governor Ron Desantis are headed into what is sure to be a nail-biter of a head to head battle for the Republican nomination. Recent polls show Trump climbing above Desantis where it had been the opposite only a couple of months ago. This is surely a testament to the human psyche. Trump is center stage again whereas Desantis is feeling the effects of the adage that “what is out of sight is out of mind.” 

Trump, who is certainly no stranger to press, public scrutiny, and legal persecution is now gaining some sympathy from voters who consider themselves in the middle or who were otherwise non-committal concerning the 2024 political hopefuls. As yet another seemingly “trumped-up” case drags the former President back into the court room, hearts and minds sway. When the legal genius of former CIA deputy director Andrew McCabe who is now a contributor for CNN admits to their viewers that the case against Trump is a “disappointment” due to it’s seeming lack of teeth – even the more liberal minds may begin to doubt if the day will ever come that sees Trump behind bars as pundits on CNN have been promising for years on end. An audience can surely only eat the same baloney so many times before they begin to turn away in disgust.

The question arises how Desantis may feel about these changes in polling and seeming popularity. Trump has the clout of having already won the National race in the infamous 2016 cycle, but will this and the new publicity regarding the latest round of politically-charged prosecutions be enough to secure another win? Desantis has of course never stated that he will in fact run for the presidency in the upcoming cycle, but his name has been in the forefront of many hearts, minds, and political polls with many taking it for granted that he will indeed run. 

A new report from the Washington Examiner detailing that Trump appears to be trying to “poach” some of the Florida Governor’s largest donors, makes this author wonder whether Desantis may indeed switch gears and pursue his own ambitions with a gusto that he has been hesitant to exhibit thus far. Only time will tell, but when one’s source of funding comes into question men have a habit of reacting. Whether Desantis intends to run for President or not, he surely has future ambitions, and to lose some of his biggest donors to former President Trump may hinder his abilities to raise capital and fund future campaigns.

As we watch the race unfold, more and more scrutiny will be applied to these two men. Trump has missed no punches making clear his ambitions and goals to be seated as the 47th President. As of the publishing of this article it appears that the ball is in Desantis’s court to make his decision and to fight to clear his own path to the primary nomination on the Republican ticket if he wants it.

Categories
Opinions

Stolen Elections

In America today public discourse has reached a fever pitch; the “Melting Pot” seems to be on the verge of boiling over sending us out of the proverbial pan and into the fire. The two-party system that has dominated our politics and our lives for the length and entirety thereof, seem to quite literally be ripping the country in two. With both major parties more and more frequently calling into question the validity of the American voter system, and the legitimacy of the vote itself – tensions and attitudes begin to grow taunt.

Without going into the back and forth that has been going on probably since the national elections of 2000, and similarly neglecting to get into the whole “who started it” line of discussion, I wanted to take a moment to bring something to the attention of all Americans and all people willing to take the time to read this article. The world recently saw a perfectly stark example of a stolen and rigged election; forced even.

Of course I am speaking of the elections held in the Russian occupied parts of Ukraine. These people had Russians bang on their door, point a gun in their faces, hand them a ballot and say “vote for Putin.” Of course the ballots came back 99% in favor of being annexed by Russia, and exactly as Putin wants them to.

To my fellow Americans and countrymen and to people all over this world: I pray that we may heed this example, and learn from it. May we learn to lower the temperature of our discourse surrounding elections and other incendiary topics of the day. May we remember why this country was founded. Our constitution spells out no quartering of troops, no unwarranted search and seizure, no forced self-implication, and so many other rights that I fear we may have forgotten or too often take for granted.

There are certain presidents, and certain elections that I have not found favorable. I don’t think it is wrong to doubt, question, or scrutinize. But at least we may all take comfort in knowing that no one is banging on our doors, putting guns in our faces, and forcing us to elect governments that we don’t approve. We are still quite a peaceful nation – despite the heat and fever pitch. I pray we may remain so, and that this Russian example be the last of its kind anywhere.

I have included references that you may interact with as you like, but I did not rely on any one of them heavily enough to cite them specifically. Thank you, and may God bless you, and may God bless America!

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/09/putin-russia-referendum-election-results-domestic-propaganda/671595/

Categories
Our Stories The Wicky Wacky Radio Show

Sneak Peak!

This may give a big clue about an upcoming podcast your wonderful hosts hope to air on The Wicky Wacky Radio Show, and just in time for Christmas! Just don’t tell Santa, and we won’t either!!! Merry Christmas from Contemporary Conservative!


Brewed in Texas – Brewed with Peaches and Pecans, a dark wheat flavored ale, “a smoothness that makes the subtle texas peach and roasted pecan flavors all the more satisfying.” 5.4% ABV

Brewed in Cincinnati, OH. “Inspiring madness, rooted in purpose” An Indian Pale Ale with Spruce Tips. 6.8% ABV

Brewed here in Columbus – “a Hoppy Holiday Ale” 7.3% ABV

Brewed in Cincinnati. “Hoppy Holiday Ale” [Hi thirsty, I’m Dad – a hoppy red ale with robust malt as ample and snug as a well-worn flannel – notes of dank piney hops – uphill both ways in the snow. Keep it up and I’ll turn this can around. 6.0% ABV

Brewed in Chicago, IL. “Festively Smooth” 7.5%ABV

Brewed in Waunakee, WI. Dill Pickle + Xmas Gose 4.3% ABV